Kevin Reddington: Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer, Cases and Mistrial Fight

Last updated: 23 October 2026. This profile is based on court reporting and public records. It is not legal advice.

Short answer: Kevin Reddington is a veteran Massachusetts criminal defence lawyer who graduated from Suffolk University Law School in 1975 and has practised for about five decades. He is best known in 2026 as lead counsel for Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury mother charged with killing her three children. Her trial ended in a mistrial on 4 September 2026, and Reddington is now asking the court to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds.

Key takeaways

• Reddington is a Boston-area defence attorney with roughly 50 years in practice, known for taking on high-profile homicide and organised crime cases, including work connected to the Whitey Bulger prosecutions.
• He built Lindsay Clancy’s defence around postpartum psychosis and overmedication, arguing she was not criminally responsible.
• The jury deliberated for more than seven days. Reports said jurors were split 11 to 1, and Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on 4 September 2026.
• On 21 October 2026 the judge refused Reddington’s request for a hearing into the holdout juror. The double jeopardy motion itself is due to be argued on 2 November 2026.
• His net worth has never been published. Any figure you see online is a guess.

Who is Kevin Reddington?

Kevin Reddington is a criminal defence lawyer based in Massachusetts. He earned his law degree from Suffolk University Law School in Boston in 1975 and has spent most of his career in state and federal criminal courts in New England. Over the decades he has represented clients in murder trials, drug conspiracies and organised crime matters, including a defence connected to the case of the Boston gangster James “Whitey” Bulger.

He has a reputation as an aggressive trial lawyer who is comfortable attacking the prosecution’s investigation in front of a jury and speaking bluntly to the press outside court. That style has been on full display in the Clancy case.

What is the Lindsay Clancy case?

Lindsay Clancy is charged with three counts of first-degree murder over the deaths of her children, Cora (5), Dawson (3) and Callan (8 months), at the family home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, on 24 January 2023. Prosecutors in Plymouth County say she planned the killings and knew what she was doing was wrong.

Reddington’s defence was that Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis after her third child’s birth and had been prescribed a large number of psychiatric medications in the months before the deaths. Wikipedia’s summary of the trial records that she had been prescribed 13 different psychiatric drugs. The defence argued this left her unable to understand or control her actions, which under Massachusetts law can support a verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility.

Reddington also challenged the police investigation of the scene, questioned the knowledge of some medical witnesses, and pointed out that much of the prosecution’s account depended on statements Patrick Clancy, her husband, gave to police at the scene.

Why did the Clancy trial end in a mistrial?

The jury could choose between five outcomes: not guilty by reason of insanity, not guilty, first-degree murder, second-degree murder or manslaughter. According to CBS News, on 3 September 2026 the foreperson told the judge that the jury was split 11 to 1 and that one juror would not apply reasonable doubt. Reddington asked the judge to remove that juror and to question jurors further. Judge William Sullivan refused.

The next day, 4 September, after more than seven days of deliberation, the judge declared a mistrial. Later reporting said the 11 jurors in the majority favoured a finding that Clancy was not criminally responsible, with one juror holding out for a conviction. Clancy remains in treatment at Tewksbury State Hospital.

What is Reddington’s double jeopardy argument?

The Fifth Amendment, and the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, protect a defendant from being tried twice for the same offence. When a judge declares a mistrial without the defendant’s consent, a retrial is only allowed if there was “manifest necessity” for ending the first trial, such as a jury that truly cannot agree.

Reddington argues there was no manifest necessity here. In his view the jury was not genuinely deadlocked; instead one juror refused to follow the judge’s instructions on the law, and the court should have dealt with that juror rather than ending the trial. If he wins, prosecutors could not try Clancy again and she would go free. CBS legal contributor Caroline Polisi described the motion as a long shot.

On 21 October 2026, Judge Sullivan rejected Reddington’s request for an evidentiary hearing into the holdout juror, ruling that a mistrial must be judged on what the court knew at the time and that judges cannot examine how jurors reasoned. He also denied a motion for a required finding of not guilty. The double jeopardy motion is due to be argued on 2 November 2026. Prosecutors have not said whether they will seek a second trial.

What has Reddington said publicly?

Reddington has been unusually outspoken. After the mistrial he told reporters he did not want a second trial, said he would never agree to any jail time for Clancy, and suggested the district attorney could reduce the charge. He also publicly asked President Trump for a pardon, even though a president can only pardon federal offences and Clancy faces state charges. He said he hoped the case would raise awareness of postpartum psychosis.

That approach has drawn criticism as well as support. Prosecutors have asked the court to limit public statements about the case while a retrial is undecided.

What is Kevin Reddington’s net worth?

There is no reliable figure. Reddington is a private practitioner and has never disclosed his income or assets, and no credible financial publication has estimated his wealth. Senior criminal defence lawyers who handle murder trials in the US commonly charge six-figure flat fees for a single case, but how much any individual lawyer earns depends on their caseload and fee arrangements. Treat any precise “net worth” number for Reddington as speculation.

For context on what the highest-earning lawyers are actually worth, see our list of the richest lawyers in the world.

Frequently asked questions

Who is Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer?

Lindsay Clancy is represented by Kevin Reddington, a Massachusetts criminal defence attorney with about 50 years of experience. He led her defence at the 2026 trial in Plymouth Superior Court.

Was Lindsay Clancy found guilty?

No. Her trial ended in a mistrial on 4 September 2026 after the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict. She has not been convicted, and prosecutors have not yet said whether they will retry her.

What is a double jeopardy motion?

It asks a court to bar a second prosecution for the same offence. After a mistrial declared without the defendant’s consent, a retrial is only allowed if there was manifest necessity to end the first trial. Reddington says there was not.

When is the next hearing in the Clancy case?

Arguments on the double jeopardy motion and related requests for juror records were scheduled for 2 November 2026.

Where did Kevin Reddington go to law school?

He graduated from Suffolk University Law School in Boston in 1975.

Related: Brian Steel: the lawyer behind Young Thug and Lil Durk and Jose Baez: net worth and famous cases.

Featured image: Kevin Reddington in court, September 2026. Still from video by Mo News via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0, cropped.