Part of the Forensic Docket on Legal Desire Forensics — a conviction confirmed through final appeal, kept here as a method-of-crime record.
The facts
The accused murdered his stepmother.
His conviction rested largely on ocular evidence, supported to a limited extent by circumstantial evidence, including the natural presence of the deceased’s brother in the house at the time.
Status: conviction upheld through final appeal.
Why this belongs in the Forensic Docket: Shows how a largely ocular case still leans on circumstantial detail, like who else was plausibly present, to close gaps eyewitness testimony alone cannot.
Case details
| Citation | [2012] 4 S.C.R. 342 |
| Case number | Criminal Appeal No. 500/2010 |
| Court | Indian Supreme Court |
| Decided | 2012 |
| Module | MO Archive |
Read the full judgment (PDF), sourced from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (AWS Open Data Registry, CC-BY-4.0).
Explore more in the Forensic Docket or browse the full Forensics hub.
Where the legal industry reads first.
Enjoyed this article? Get the biggest legal industry updates, deals, appointments, insights and expert interviews in your inbox, free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.From Legal Desire
Is your firm the one being cited, or the one being skipped?
We ran the test. On several everyday legal questions, software companies are answering and law firms are not. We help firms fix that, and we build the technology behind the practice.
Lawyers and firms: get featured on Legal Desire
Share your deals, lateral moves, firm news and insights with 1M+ monthly readers: founders, law firm partners, general counsel and practising lawyers across the US, UK, EU and GCC.
Get featuredSubmit a press release