
The Legality of Moonlighting
In order to combat the pandemic and comply with government orders, almost all workplaces were forced to ask their employees to work remotely or adopt a hybrid mode of working. For many sectors which were doing well before the pandemic, it also led to fewer jobs and high costs. This shift in turn gave rise to concepts like moonlighting, sunlighting and quiet quitting among working professionals. Moonlighting comes from the term moonlighter, which is used to describe a person who takes up second work during the night time. So in simple terms, it is the practice where a person takes up work, typically after their regular work hours. Whereas, sunlighting means that the employee cuts hours on the regular job to work a second job. Quiet quitting means the simple act of doing the bare minimum at work.
While all such practices have serious implications for both the employer and employee, in this article we will restrict ourselves to moonlighting and its legality.
There are several reasons why moonlighting has been on the rise including –
While moonlighting is prevalent in most sectors, it is the most visible in the IT sector. This is because the IT sector can operate remotely, which enables the employees to take up simultaneous assignments.
The laws of most countries do not define moonlighting. But there are several provisions that talk about dual employment even though there is no concrete or specific law that regulates this practice.
The contract law in common law countries makes the agreements in restraint of trade void (except goodwill). But the position with respect to the restrictive covenants in employment contracts like non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality with regards to intellectual property is recognised by the courts. There is no blanket law and the position is not completely settled yet whether it amounts to a breach of trust varies on a case-to-case basis. In such a scenario, the employer could have an option of putting such restrictive clauses along with a moonlighting clause in the agreement to protect their interests better.
In the USA, the laws prevent federal employees from handling dual jobs and the policies differ from company to company.
In countries like Japan, which are known for their stricter work culture, the threat of getting fired due to moonlighting is high.
In the Indian context, some labour laws talk about dual employment –
In addition to these, there are several regulations in different sectors that restrict moonlighting. For example, the bar council rules in most nations state that a practising advocate can’t take up other jobs. Similar regulations apply to doctors throughout the world.
But these laws have limited application and do not cover all the diverse sectors that are there. Given the confusion regarding the stance on dual employment, it is yet to be seen whether different countries come up with nation-centric laws to regulate this practice.
In the absence of such laws, let’s look at the possible ways to tackle moonlighting
In conclusion, it becomes evident that moonlighting is a delicate situation for companies to deal with. But there is no harm in permitting moonlighting, given that there is a well-defined legal policy in the picture, which can be enforced in a court of law. It is necessary for the welfare of the employees and the employers that they work together so that it turns out to be a mutually beneficial arrangement. At present, having no definite law leads it prone to varied interpretations. The court or the legislature needs to address this issue or it could lead to chaos and mismanagement at workplaces.
References
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9591-moonlighting-dual-employment-in-indian-law.html
https://www.dailyo.in/news/can-you-be-fired-for-moonlighting-what-does-the-law-say-37396