NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Hogan Lovells files amicus brief on behalf of organizations seeking to prevent gun violence in Washington, D.C.
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Hogan Lovells files amicus brief on behalf of organizations seeking to prevent gun violence in Washington, D.C.
Deals

Hogan Lovells files amicus brief on behalf of organizations seeking to prevent gun violence in Washington, D.C.

By Legal Desire 3 Min Read
Share

Washington, D.C., September 26, 2022 – Global law firm Hogan Lovells filed an amicus brief on behalf of Brady, Team Enough, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and March For Our Lives Action Fund, in support of the constitutionality of the District of Columbia’s ban on firearms on the Metro transit system.

The brief was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Angelo v. District of Columbia, et al., in which plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of the District’s law prohibiting guns on the Metro and city buses in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 23 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which made it more difficult for government entities to restrict the carrying of firearms outside the home.

The brief explains that the Metro firearms ban is consistent with the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and historical practice because the Metro is a “sensitive place” unsuited to the routine carrying of guns. The brief particularly points out that D.C.’s Metro and buses are filled with children and teens using the transit system to go to school, that they serves countless federal office buildings and institutions where guns are reasonably prohibited, and that Metro trains, buses, and station platforms are crowded and enclosed locations where it is impossible to escape in the event of gunfire.

The brief reads in part: “Plaintiffs’ theory, if adopted, would bring about disastrous consequences for the District of Columbia and for everyone who lives, works, or visits our nation’s capital. Gun violence is already a significant issue in DC and nationwide… A ruling that the District cannot prohibit the carrying of guns on Metro trains or buses would substantially increase the number of guns carried in public and undoubtedly increase the frequency of gun usage, injury, and death. This result is not constitutionally required and would undercut DC’s use of a commonsense regulation to protect residents and visitors from gun violence.”

Hogan Lovells Senior Counsel Ira Feinberg noted: “The Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen makes clear that cities and states can continue to enforce reasonable laws that prohibit carrying firearms in sensitive places and protect the safety of its citizens, including those riding on Metro trains and buses. We are proud to be working on this case with our partners at Brady, Team Enough, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and March For Our Lives to protect the safety of everyone who lives or works in or visits our nation’s capital.”

In addition to Feinberg, Hogan Lovells’ legal team includes partner Jonathan Diesenhaus and associates Toccara Nelson, Alex Schulman, and Alexandria Reid, all based in Washington, D.C.

The brief can be found here.

You Might Also Like

Baker McKenzie Acts on the Privatization of Vesync

Mayer Brown advises Munich Re Life US on strategic partnership with MIB to expand access to electronic medical data and develop advanced data analytics

Herbert Smith Freehills advises ad hoc noteholder group on the financial restructuring of InfraBuild’s 14.5000% Senior Secured Notes

Herbert Smith Freehills advises Rover on acquisition of Gudog

Latham & Watkins Advises on Agree Realty’s US$340.65 Million Forward Common Stock Offering

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire September 26, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Baker McKenzie Acts on the Privatization of Vesync

Baker McKenzie advised DBS Asia Capital Limited as the financial adviser to the offeror, Victory III Co., Ltd, in connection…

Deals
May 10, 2025

Mayer Brown advises Munich Re Life US on strategic partnership with MIB to expand access to electronic medical data and develop advanced data analytics

Mayer Brown is advising Munich Re Life US, part of Munich Re Group and a leader in risk assessment and…

Deals
May 6, 2025

Herbert Smith Freehills advises ad hoc noteholder group on the financial restructuring of InfraBuild’s 14.5000% Senior Secured Notes

Herbert Smith Freehills has acted as Australian counsel to the ad hoc group of noteholders on the restructuring of InfraBuild…

Deals
May 6, 2025

Herbert Smith Freehills advises Rover on acquisition of Gudog

The London Financial Sponsors practice of leading global law firm Herbert Smith Freehills has advised Rover Group, Inc. (Rover) on…

Deals
May 6, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?