NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: ‘Universities free to set Qualifying Percentage’ says Madhya Pradesh HC
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » ‘Universities free to set Qualifying Percentage’ says Madhya Pradesh HC
NewsUncategorized

‘Universities free to set Qualifying Percentage’ says Madhya Pradesh HC

By Maitreya Saha 3 Min Read
Share

Madhya Pradesh High Court on Sunday adjudged that Universities in India are free to prescribe the minimum qualifying cut off marks for admissions to respective law courses, provided that it is not below 45%, as has been set to be the least requirement by the Bar Council of India.

The HC at MP was hearing a Petition filed by Shri Ramakrishna College of Law, demanding a direction to Awadhesh Pratap Singh University, Rewa to lower the minimum cut-off percentage prescribed by the University, from 50% to 45%, in light of the BCI Rules framed in this regard. The Hon’ble Court, however, declined to accept this reasoning, and observed, “A perusal of Ordinance 116 of the University indicates that the University has prescribed 50% as the qualifying marks which is in accordance with the rules framed by the Bar Council of India Rules. We are also of the considered opinion that the interpretation given to Rule 7 by the petitioner to the Bar Council of India Rules cannot be accepted as the rule specifically permits the University to prescribe the minimum qualifying percentage of marks not be below 45% marks without specifying the upper limit and in such circumstances, we do not find any merit in the contention of the petitioner.”

A Bench comprising Justice R.S. Jha and Justice Nandita Dubey interpreted Rule 7 of the BCI Rules and said that only the minimum qualifying percentage had been prescribed and that there was no upper limit, as their ratio decidendi.
Interpreting Rule 7 of the Bar Council of India rules the court observed that the Bar Council of India, while prescribing the minimum qualifying marks for admission, has laid down that “the Bar Council of India may from time to time stipulate the minimum percentage of marks not below 45% of the total marks in case of general category candidates, 42% marks for the OBC category candidates and 40% of the total marks for the SC and ST category candidates to be obtained for the qualifying exam”
The division bench further said that the very words “not below 45%” makes it abundantly clear that the University cannot prescribe the minimum qualifying marks or percentage to be below 45% marks but can certainly prescribe a higher qualifying percentage of marks.

 

You Might Also Like

Business Without Borders? Think Again.

Dentons advises NET4GAS on CZK 4 billion refinancing facility (in Czech)

Dentons and Kirkland & Ellis advise Blue Owl Capital on ÂŁ403 million joint venture investment with SUPR

Latham & Watkins Advises Divert on US$90+ Million Financing From Nuveen Energy Infrastructure Credit

Latham & Watkins Represents Hyatt Hotels in US$1 Billion Bond Offering

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Maitreya Saha July 31, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Business Without Borders? Think Again.

In today’s global economy, there is an increasing interest in expanding business horizons through cross-border transactions, whereby companies engage with…

Uncategorized
May 5, 2025

Dentons advises NET4GAS on CZK 4 billion refinancing facility (in Czech)

GlobálnĂ­ právnĂ­ firma Dentons poskytla právnĂ­ poradenstvĂ­ NET4GAS, s.r.o. („NET4GAS“), vĂ˝hradnĂ­mu provozovateli pĹ™epravnĂ­ soustavy plynu v ÄŚeskĂ© republice, pĹ™i zĂ­skánĂ­…

Uncategorized
April 30, 2025

Dentons and Kirkland & Ellis advise Blue Owl Capital on ÂŁ403 million joint venture investment with SUPR

London—Dentons, together with Kirkland & Ellis, have advised US alternative asset manager Blue Owl Capital on a joint venture (JV)…

Uncategorized
April 30, 2025

Latham & Watkins Advises Divert on US$90+ Million Financing From Nuveen Energy Infrastructure Credit

Nuveen Energy Infrastructure Credit, a part of the US$1.3 trillion asset manager of TIAA, and Divert, Inc., a circular economy…

DealsUncategorized
April 5, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?