NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: U.S. jury sides with Amphastar Pharma (AMPH) over Momenta Phama (MNTA) in drug patent trial
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » U.S. jury sides with Amphastar Pharma (AMPH) over Momenta Phama (MNTA) in drug patent trial
InternationalNews

U.S. jury sides with Amphastar Pharma (AMPH) over Momenta Phama (MNTA) in drug patent trial

By Pallavi Versha 3 Min Read
Share

A federal jury handed Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc a big win on Friday after it was accused of infringing on a patent held by Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc through its production of a generic version of the blood-thinner Lovenox.

According to court records, the jury ruled on Friday that while  AMPH infringed MNTA patent for testing the quality of batches of the drug, the patent was invalid. The lawsuit was filed by Cambridge, Massachusetts-based biotechnology company Momenta and its partner, Novartis AG’s Sandoz unit, that sought $938 million in damages, which began July 11.

“We are very pleased with the jury’s verdict and especially pleased that Amphastar is now out from under this baseless lawsuit,” Michael Sommer, an attorney for Amphastar, said in a statement. He added that a victory for Momenta could threaten to bankrupt Amphastar, cost 1,300 jobs in the U.S., and hurt “all the people who rely on its life- saving medications.”

Momenta Chief Executive Craig Wheeler in a statement said the company was disappointed and was considering its options, including a potential appeal. “We continue to believe in the importance of investing in innovative techniques for bringing products to market and protecting those innovations from unauthorized use,” he said.

During the trial, Momenta’s lawyers defended the validity of the patent for the testing, and argued Amphastar must pay for using the technology without permission. “They used the invention in violation of Momenta’s right on purpose and with knowledge.”

Following the verdict, Shares of Momenta were down around 3 percent, while shares of Amphastar were up about 3 percent.

The case stemmed from Momenta’s partnership with Sandoz to develop and commercialize a generic version of enoxaparin, which is sold by Sanofi Aventis under the brand name Lovenox. Under that agreement, Momenta served as Sandoz’s contract laboratory.

Momenta, whose generic version Lovenox was the first to receive FDA approval in 2010, claimed Amphastar’s infringement and subsequent sales of its own generic caused it to suffer a significant loss of profits.

Momenta also has a generic version of multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone on the market, called Glatopa. It is developing biosimilars to Orencia, Bristol-Myers Squibb’s drug for rheumatoid arthritis, and to Humira, the arthritis blockbuster made by AbbVie.

The Humira copycat is slated for a commercial launch as early as 2020 after generating positive late-stage trial data in November, while the Orencia biosimilar is in a Phase 1 study.

The case is Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc., 11cv11681, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Boston).

 

You Might Also Like

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Honeymoon Murder

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Shein Accused of Dark Patterns in EU

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Pallavi Versha July 23, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, in its detailed judgment, upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse TikTok’s…

News
June 15, 2025

The Honeymoon Murder

A recent honeymoon murder case has shocked the entire nation. Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi was found dead in a gorge…

News
June 15, 2025

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Harvard University has recently achieved a significant victory in its legal fight against the Trump administration’s attempt to ban the…

News
June 9, 2025

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, who was arrested by West Bengal police on May 30,…

News
June 9, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?