
‘Quiet quitting’ is a phenomenon that has gained prominence in recent years in businesses and among people all around the world. While the roots and frequency of silent resigning are still being debated, there is no doubting that it shows a rising unhappiness and disengagement among employees. This blog will examine the idea of quiet quitting, its effects on both individuals and organisations, and potential countermeasures.
The concept of quiet quitting has several facets and extends beyond merely “checking out” or going through the motions at work. It reflects a deeper level of unhappiness and disengagement among workers, which frequently results from a mismatch between their beliefs and goals for their careers and the standards established by their employer.
The intentional withdrawal of what are referred to as “citizenship behaviours” is a crucial component of quiet quitting. These actions are optional and not specifically called for in a job description, such as volunteering for additional projects, supporting coworkers, or taking the initiative to streamline procedures. Quiet quitters do their principal jobs well, but they don’t go above and beyond, putting little time, effort, and passion into things that aren’t absolutely required.
In many workplaces like hospitals and restaurants, employees often work two full shifts consecutively (double shifts). This can exacerbate disengagement, as employees facing burnout are more likely to resort to quiet quitting. To learn how to manage workload expectations and support your team, click here.
This disengagement may seem as a loss of enthusiasm for personal development, a reduction in team participation, or a lack of initiative and inventiveness. Quiet quitters may follow through on their contractual commitments and fulfil deadlines, but with time, their drive and enthusiasm for their work fade. They frequently place a high priority on work-life balance and look for methods to keep personal and business lives apart.
Quiet quitting might affect areas of a person’s life other than their job, such as their relationships or personal obligations. The phrase has become more popular as individuals realise its importance outside of the workplace. It reflects a larger trend in society’s emphasis on placing a premium on health, self-care, and a more all-encompassing view of success and fulfilment.
Organisations in various industries face issues as a result of the rise of quiet quitting. This group includes over half of the workforce, which represents a huge loss of potential in terms of productivity, innovation, and creativity. Moreover, with the labour market being so tight right now, replacing silent quitters is difficult. To sustain organisational effectiveness and lessen the effects of an unengaged workforce, managers must carefully handle this problem.
The growth in quiet quitting is caused by a number of variables. People have been pushed to prioritise work-life balance and their own wellbeing by social media and growing knowledge of alternative lifestyles. The COVID-19 pandemic also caused people to reassess their priorities, with many workers looking for more fulfilment and significance outside of their employment. A gap between personal ideals and organisational objectives as well as a lack of recognition and advancement opportunities all contribute to the problem.
To keep a motivated and engaged staff, organisations must adapt and deal with the issue of quiet quitting. Here are a few possible tactics:
Though the term “quiet quitting” has been more well-known recently, its underlying feelings of disengagement and unhappiness have always existed in organisations. Organisations must endeavour to comprehend the causes of silent resignation as they navigate this trend and put in place initiatives that put an emphasis on employee wellbeing, personal development, and a healthy work environment. Businesses may revitalise their employees, promote an engaged culture, and increase productivity and performance in the always changing workplace by doing this.