NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: To determine compensation, the suffering and incapacity of enjoying basic amenities, inability to earn must be regarded by the adjudicating authority
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: To determine compensation, the suffering and incapacity of enjoying basic amenities, inability to earn must be regarded by the adjudicating authority
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: To determine compensation, the suffering and incapacity of enjoying basic amenities, inability to earn must be regarded by the adjudicating authority

By Sanjana Chakraborty 4 Min Read
Share

The Apex Court on 01.07.2019. in Parminder Singh v New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. , had allowed the appeal that had been filed by the Appellant contesting the Punjab and Haryana high Court’s order and judgment.

FACTS:

The Appellant being the driver had been driving a car wherein a Cabinet Minister of Punjab was traveling to Ludhiana, when a truck had rammed into the Car by means of rash and negligence as a part of contributory negligence from the part of another driver from the other truck that was place on the roadside in a wrong manner causing injury and accident to Minister as well as the driver resulting in permanent disability.

As a result, the Appellant succumbed to fatal injuries, that included injuries on head, followed by innumerable surgeries, face disfiguration, fractures, etc. On being examined by a Medical Board, the Appellant was detected with hemiplegia .It was further opined by the doctor that the appellant had lost his capability of working as a laborer or perform any work related to agriculture or as a driver and that his disability was permanent in nature by 75%.

Subsequently, a claim petition had been filed by the Appellant before the MACT, against the owners and drivers of the trucks, along with the insurer of the two offending trucks causing accident (the Respondent – Insurance Company.)

It had been pleaded by the respondent that person driving those two truck owners did not posses valid licenses and that the licenses were issued in other names. An award of compensation of amount of Rs. 10,43,666/¬ awarded by MACT while further upheld that the drivers were severally as well jointly held liable for compensating the Appellant while the Respondent was absolved of the liability.

As such, a FAO was filed by the appellant for enhancing the amount of compensation before the High Court wherein the Appellant was reassessed by a Medical Board at the Government Hospital which held that the Appellant had suffered disability by 100% while the capacity to earn had been lost and that he had to fully dependent upon his family from so on. The FAO was permitted in parts while enhancing the amount of compensation as well Future Prospects @ 50% was also granted to the Appellant, along with compensation to be paid by the Respondent as well.

DECISION HELD BY THE APEX COURT:

When the matter was brought before the Supreme Court of India , the Apex Court while allowing the appeal rightly upheld the assessment made by the High Court with regard to the terms of disability and loss of capacity to earn by the Appellant thereby enhancing the award amount to Rs. 32,40,000/- as well as a lump sum amount of Rs. 7,50,000/- with regarding to the hospitalization and medical expenditure incurred by the Appellant.

Full Judgment here:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2018/26882/26882_2018_6_1502_14640_Judgement_01-Jul-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sanjana Chakraborty July 2, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?