NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: The benefits granted as per any judgment can’t be taken away in collateral proceedings
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: The benefits granted as per any judgment can’t be taken away in collateral proceedings
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: The benefits granted as per any judgment can’t be taken away in collateral proceedings

By Palak Arora 3 Min Read
Share

A two-judge bench of the apex court on 10.10.2018 in S.G. BARAPATRE & ORS. V. SHRI ANANTA GAJANAN GAIKI & ORS. (CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10387-10388/2018) granted the permission to file special leave petition(s) against the orders of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur. The bench comprised of:-

  • JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
  • JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

FACTS: Some of the appellants were parties before the High Court who declined to subject themselves to caste scrutiny and, therefore, pursuant to the directions of the High Court their services were to be discontinued and their payments or dues were not to be released. The High Court further directed to recover the payments already made and asked the Food Corporation of India or the Reserve Bank of India to also initiate necessary steps within next two months to recover payments or dues released, from the employees who had given up caste claim.

The Food Corporation of India challenged this order and filed special leave petition(s) before the Supreme Court which was dismissed. Review Petition(s) was also attempted and the same was also dismissed.

ISSUES:

Whether High Court was right in discontinuing the services and not releasing the dues to the people who declined to subject themselves to caste scrutiny?

OBSERVATIONS: The Supreme court of India, while deciding the case, observed that:-

  • The employees covered by the HC’s judgment shall only be entitled to the benefits which have been granted specifically in paragraph 18 of the judgment.
  • For all purposes, those people would get themselves arrayed in the general category as on 28.11.2000 and placed below the last of the general category candidate as on that date.
  • The benefits which had been granted as per the judgment of the High Court could not be taken away in collateral proceedings.

HELD: The Supreme Court modified the impugned orders to the extent what court observed while deciding the case and appeals along with pending applications were disposed of with no orders as to costs.

For full judgement refer: https://www.supremecourt.gov.in/supremecourt/2018/18893/18893_2018_Judgement_10-Oct-2018.pdf

 

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Palak Arora October 15, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?