NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: The appellate authority cannot pass stereo type orders without hearing the parties
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: The appellate authority cannot pass stereo type orders without hearing the parties
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: The appellate authority cannot pass stereo type orders without hearing the parties

By Sanjana Chakraborty 2 Min Read
Share

The Apex Court on 23.04.2019, in Cantonment Board, Meerut & Anr v Afzal , had dismissed the appeal that had been made  against the High Court of Allahabad’s order by the Cantonment Board, Meerut and others praying to quash the notices that had been issued under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924,  to stop the constructions that had been continuing in an unauthorized manner by the respondents alongside to quash the notices for demolishing the constructions so raised followed by the washing of the appellate authority’s order.

The  aforesaid Act   had been repealed  by Section 360 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 .Prior to the new Act coming into effect, proceedings were initiated by the  Cantonment Executive Officer under Sections 184 and 185 of the 1924 Act, upon the grounds that unauthorized constructions had been carried out without  permission and despite issuing show cause notices no action was taken legally.

Being aggrieved by such notice, a statutory appeal under Section 274 of the 1924 Act had been filed that faced a dismissal. The notice was challenged under Section 185 of the 1924 Act followed by the order and a petition before the High Court.

The orders  were challenged  upon the grounds  such as that there lacked an authority to the Executive Officer for issuing  such notice while the notice was devoid of any jurisdiction, that the notice that was issued was time barred  and that they had not been provided with opportunity of being heard before passing the order by the Appellate Authority. Subsequently, the orders were quashed except the third one, by the High Court while being left open for the appellants for initiating   fresh proceedings.

DECISION HELD BY THE APEX COURT:

When the matter was brought before the Apex Court, the Apex Court while dismissing the appeal, held it did not found any error in the order rendered by the High Court.

Read full judgment here:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2014/8292/8292_2014_Judgement_23-Apr-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sanjana Chakraborty April 24, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?