NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: Mere delay in filing of the report/FIR shall not lead to the acquittal of the accused or weaken the case of the prosecution
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: Mere delay in filing of the report/FIR shall not lead to the acquittal of the accused or weaken the case of the prosecution
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: Mere delay in filing of the report/FIR shall not lead to the acquittal of the accused or weaken the case of the prosecution

By Sanjana Chakraborty 2 Min Read
Share

The Apex Court on 28.01.2019, in Satya Raj Singh  v  State of Madhya, dismissed the appeal  that had been made against  the High Court of Madhya Pradesh’s final judgment and order where the Division Bench of the High Court had  dismissed  the appeal while upholding  Additional  Sessions Judge’s judgment ,  wherein the appellant was held  guilty of offences   under   Section   302/34   of   the IPC, 1860  while being sentenced  of undergoing life imprisonment as well as  fine of Rs.1000/­followed by    rigorous   imprisonment   for   a period of months in case of default in  fine.

FACTS:

 The three accused persons had been prosecuted for the commission of murder of a person under Section 302/34 IPC. The Appellant was held guilty for the commission of the offences under   Section   302/34   IPC  by the Additional Sessions Judge while being sentenced imprisonment for life while the other two were acquitted. Being grieved, an appeal had been by the Appellant before the High Court of  Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. However, no appeal had been made against the Additional Sessions Judge’s order wherein the other two accused were acquitted, making the acquittal order final. Subsequently, the appeal had to face dismissal at the hands of the High Court, resulting in an appeal by special leave was made in the Apex Court.

 

DECISION HELD BY THE APEX COURT:

The Apex Court while dismissing the appeal upheld the the High Court‘s order of    conviction against the appellant as the evidence cited by prosecution was beyond any reasonable doubt, further quashing the contention raised by the appellant regarding the delay while filing   the FIR by opining that it was impossible to form the part of the complainant to visit the   Police Station that   very far away from the site of occurrence immediately in that night for lodging of the report/FIR.

 

Judgment:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2012/25895/25895_2012_Judgement_28-Jan-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sanjana Chakraborty January 30, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?