NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: High Court cannot dismiss an application under Section 482 of the CrPC without giving regard to the facts of the case
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: High Court cannot dismiss an application under Section 482 of the CrPC without giving regard to the facts of the case
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: High Court cannot dismiss an application under Section 482 of the CrPC without giving regard to the facts of the case

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share

Hon’ble Supreme Court has allowed a Criminal appeal here on 07-01-2019 against the order of High court by stating that before dismissing an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C the High Courts must understand the factual matrix.

The above decision was given in the case of Monu v. State of U.P. & Anr. in which hon’ble court declared that in the matters when the high courts are dismissing the application of Cr.P.C 482 they must know the facts first.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

By   impugned   order,   the   Single   Judge dismissed the appellant’s application filed under Section 482 of the Code wherein the challenge was to set aside the charge sheet dated 18.09.2015 and 22.09.1017 framed by the Additional Sessions Judge/ Fast Track, Court No. 3, Muzaffarnagar arising out of Sessions Trial No. 798 of 2017, State v. Monu under sections 420, 498A,323,376,506 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.  

Deprived by this order the applicant filed this criminal appeal to the Supreme Court.

DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court held that the single judge ought to have first set out the brief facts of the case with a view to understand the factual matrix and then should have examined the challenge made to the proceedings in the light of the principles of law laid down by this court on the question involved with a view to record the findings on the grounds urged by the appellant as to whether any case for interference there in is made out or not.

Thus, the appeal succeeded and High Court was ordered to re look into the application.

Read the full Judgement Here:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.nic.in/supremecourt/2018/44339/44339_2018_Judgement_07-Jan-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash January 8, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?