NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC fines Swami Om Baba Rs 10 lakh for plea on CJI selection
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC fines Swami Om Baba Rs 10 lakh for plea on CJI selection
News

SC fines Swami Om Baba Rs 10 lakh for plea on CJI selection

By Bhavya Dubey 3 Min Read
Share

A self-confessed Swami, who was a Bigg Boss participant and claimed to have 50 crore followers globally, was slapped a cost of Rs 10 lakh on Thursday for filing a petition which the Chief Justice of India said smacked of a “popularity stunt”. The matter was serious of citizens filing frivolous petitions and blocking the court’s time but there was laughter in court, courtesy Swami Om Baba’s replies to the bench’s questions.

The timing of the proceeding, perhaps, could not have been more off. The plea came before CJI J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud hours after they had dealt with the weighty subject of citizens’ privacy. Om Baba’s petition was about the selection of the CJI. Unfortunately for him, the current CJI has only one working day left in his tenure.

Why he hadn’t agitated the matter earlier, the judges asked. Om Baba replied that his state of agitation wasn’t new. He had been petitioning the President and Vice-President for over a year. “I have been agitating the matter since your appointment,” Om Baba told the CJI in Hindi.

CJI Khehar was unamused. “We feel this is a popularity stunt,” he said. Om Baba, however, wasn’t inclined to give up. “By the grace of God, I don’t need popularity. I have 50 crore followers all over the world,” he said, not knowing the remark would come back to bite him.

Explaining his point, Om Baba said that under Article 124(2) of the Constitution, the President of India was not required to consult the sitting CJI for the appointment of the next one. CJI Khehar told him: “You can’t take the Supreme Court light, this habit is increasing. It has to stop.” Om Baba clarified that he was “not leveling any allegation against anyone.” The Chief Justice retorted: “That is the problem. If you don’t satisfy us, we can impose a cost on you.”

The CJI also clarified the Article says the President can consult judges. “I’m also a judge of the SC,” he said.

The petitioner said some journalists had warned he would be put behind bars. “You mean, people come to you by themselves on seeing you?” Chief Justice Khehar asked. “I was in the Big Boss show. After that I don’t have to introduce myself,” Om Baba said.

The court dismissed the plea and imposed a cost of Rs 10 lakh each on Om Baba and Jain. Om Baba said: “I don’t have even Rs 10, let alone Rs 10 lakh.” The CJI replied: “You have 50 crore followers. You can get Re 1 from each.”

You Might Also Like

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Aumirah announces Comprehensive Newsletter Series on Key Legal Topics

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Bhavya Dubey August 25, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Depo-Provera is a widely used contraceptive injection that has recently come under legal scrutiny. Thousands of women across the United…

News
November 9, 2024

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

The legal industry welcomes a new force in business development consulting with the launch of LawStrings Management, Founded by Shubham Malhotra,…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
September 30, 2024

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Latham & Watkins has advised Astorg Philanthropy Investments (API) in the €11 million Series A funding round of InHeart, a…

News
June 29, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?