NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: Criminal Proceedings for Non-Compoundable offences under IPC cannot be quashed in spite of any settlement
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: Criminal Proceedings for Non-Compoundable offences under IPC cannot be quashed in spite of any settlement
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: Criminal Proceedings for Non-Compoundable offences under IPC cannot be quashed in spite of any settlement

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share

Hon’ble Supreme Court has allowed a Criminal appeal here on 04-01-2019 by stating that criminal Proceedings for offences under Sections 307,294 and 34 Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) cannot be quashed in spite of any outer settlement in between accuse and complainant.

The above decision was given in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kalyan Singh & Ors. in which honourable court discussed the quashing of any criminal proceeding in the matters of non-compoundable offences.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Birbal Sharma (Respondent No-5) filed a complaint against the respondent no. 1-4 under Sections 307, 294 and 34 of IPC. Respondents filed application for bail but the bail was rejected by the learned session court. Thereafter the accused approached the High Court by filing a case under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the criminal proceedings on the ground that the accused and the original complainant ha settled the dispute amicably.

The High Court in exercise of power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 quashed the criminal proceedings, solely on the ground that a settlement has been made between the complainant and the accused.

The state of Madhya Pradesh (Appellate) opposed and challenged the judgement in front of Hon’ble Supreme Court on the ground that in the cases of non- compoundable offences no settlement could be made.

DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court held that offences under Sections 307, 294 and 34 are non-compoundable in nature and the High court has committed a grave error in quashing the criminal proceedings as the criminal proceedings in the matter of non-compoundable offences cannot be quashed just because of any amicable settlement between the accused and the complainant.

Thus, SC allowed the appeal to set aside the judgement of High Court and ordered to begin the criminal proceedings again.

Read the full Judgement Here

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2014/13173/13173_2014_Judgement_04-Jan-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash January 5, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?