NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: Cases to be remanded to High Court where it  fails in framing any substantial question of law
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: Cases to be remanded to High Court where it  fails in framing any substantial question of law
JudgmentsNews

SC: Cases to be remanded to High Court where it  fails in framing any substantial question of law

By Sanjana Chakraborty 3 Min Read
Share

The  Supreme Court  of  India on  11.09.2018, in Narayana Gramani & Ors. v Mariammal & Ors. allowed the appeal filed by the plaintiffs while setting aside the judgement passed by High Court Court in allowing the second appeal of the defendants upon the question of  law.

The appeal had been  filed  against the judgment of  the High Court of Judicature when  it  allowed  the   second   appeal   filed   by defendant while  setting  aside the judgment and decree  that had been   passed   by   Additional Subordinate   Judge,   while dismissing  the suit that was  filed by the appellants .

Facts: The Appellants were the plaintiffs  who  were the family members  of the one who filed a civil suit against  the respondents  who were the defendants to the concerned civil suit   filing for a declaration and permanent injunction .

As per the version of the plaintiffs  are concerned,  a partition  had taken place where the  disputed land had fallen in their part of the share wherein they had invested a lot of money  and that the defendants were creating hassle  devoid of any legal authority along with assertion of rights over the property  whereas  it was claimed by the that  the property belonged to them  as they were the real owners .

Issues:

(1)Can a declaration and permanent injunction be allowed against the defendants?

(2) If allowed   what could be the reliefs.

The Trial Court opined that the plaintiffs were able to establish their claim by necessary evidence hence entitling them to claim a declaration and permanent injunction.

Being aggrieved by the decision of the Court, a first appeal was filed which was dismissed .While a second appeal was made, the appeal was admitted by the High Court by setting aside   the judgment and decree of the two [1]courts.

Held: A special leave petition was filed before the Apex Court by the plaintiffs, where the Supreme Court of India opined that an error had been committed by the High Court while allowing the second appeal and that the case needs to be remanded and decided as per the law. The appeal was allowed while setting aside the judgment of High Court.

 

[1] https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2007/35474/35474_2007_Judgement_11-Sep-2018.pdf

You Might Also Like

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Aumirah announces Comprehensive Newsletter Series on Key Legal Topics

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sanjana Chakraborty September 12, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Depo-Provera is a widely used contraceptive injection that has recently come under legal scrutiny. Thousands of women across the United…

News
November 9, 2024

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

The legal industry welcomes a new force in business development consulting with the launch of LawStrings Management, Founded by Shubham Malhotra,…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
September 30, 2024

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Latham & Watkins has advised Astorg Philanthropy Investments (API) in the €11 million Series A funding round of InHeart, a…

News
June 29, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?