NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: Appeal under Sec 31 of the Armed Force Tribunal Act, 2007 only lie if there is a point of law of general public importance
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: Appeal under Sec 31 of the Armed Force Tribunal Act, 2007 only lie if there is a point of law of general public importance
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: Appeal under Sec 31 of the Armed Force Tribunal Act, 2007 only lie if there is a point of law of general public importance

By Sanjana Chakraborty 2 Min Read
Share

The Apex Court on 08.01.2019, in EX. LAC YOGESH PATHANIA v UNION OF INDIA & ORS.,[1] dismissed the appeal which was made before the  Tribunal challenging sentence term and findings concluded by the District Court as well as against rejecting the Chief of Air Staff’s complaint made under the of the Air Force Act, 1950.

FACTS: The DCM had been approached due to an incident that had taken place resulting in breach of good order of the  Air Force discipline that had been created by  the airmen trainees over  the altering of the TV channel resulting in the trying of the appellant upon the charges of misconduct committed by him followed by rigorous imprisonment and dismissing him from his service.

An appeal had been made where the evidence handed over by both the parties to the dispute were examined in which the Tribunal concluded to have found no error made in the findings by the DCM. An appeal was subsequently made to the Apex Court to seek permission for filing an appeal.

DECISION HELD BY THE APEX COURT: The Apex Court  while dismissing the appeal, found no error in the appeal with regard to the jurisdiction that had been vested upon the Court under the concerned Act further interpreting that it would only exercise its jurisdiction when a question arises upon a point of law which is of public importance while in the concerned case the Apex Court  concluded that it was devoid of any general importance to the public from the point of view of law is concerned  warranting the granting of leave by the Appellant.


[1] Read Judgment:

[embeddoc url=”http://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2016/14214/14214_2016_Judgement_08-Jan-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sanjana Chakraborty January 9, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?