NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: A suit that is filed to avoid the execution of a decree is not bona fide in nature and hence liable to be dismissed
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: A suit that is filed to avoid the execution of a decree is not bona fide in nature and hence liable to be dismissed
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: A suit that is filed to avoid the execution of a decree is not bona fide in nature and hence liable to be dismissed

By Legal Desire 2 Min Read
Share

The Apex Court on 25.04.2019, in Hirabai (D) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors.  v Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya (D) by L.Rs. & Ors., had dismissed the appeal that had been  made against the  High Court   of   Judicature   at   Bombay   order and judgment wherein the second appeal was dismissed by the High Court .

FACTS:
The appeal had been made the legal representatives of two deceased plaintiffs, being the sisters of the defendant  No.3. The dispute revolved around a building that had four houses. The disputed property was sold by Defendant No.3 through a sale deed that had been registered ,while upon the buyer’s death the property was inherited by the defendants .The dispute had taken place between defendant Nos.1 and 2 with defendant No.3  as such a civil suit had been filed by the defendant  Nos.1  against   the others.

The suit had been made for declaring the title over the disputed property in which a decree was passed favoring  defendant  Nos.1   and   2/respondent   Nos.1   wherein they were also held as owners giving rise to an appeal by contesting that such a suit was bad, time barred   and collusive in nature so as to dodge the execution of the decree .The suit faced a dismissal along with all the issues.

Being aggrieved, a first appeal was made before the 2nd Additional   District   Judge that eventually faced a dismissal leading to a second appeal which as well faced dismissal and hence an appeal had been made in the Apex Court. 

ISSUE:

Was it justified from the part of the High Court to dismiss the second appeal while affirming the Trial Court as well as first Appellate Court judgment resulting in the dismissal of the suit?

HELD:

The Apex Court while dismissing the second appeal held that the suit had not been filed for a reason that was bona fide enough and rather was filed to avoid the execution of the decree against defendant No.3 

Read full judgment here:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2009/16354/16354_2009_Judgement_25-Apr-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire April 26, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?