NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Media should not write anything about anyone: SC while staying Jay Shah’s Defamation case
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Media should not write anything about anyone: SC while staying Jay Shah’s Defamation case
JudgmentsNews

Media should not write anything about anyone: SC while staying Jay Shah’s Defamation case

By Apoorva Sinha 3 Min Read
Share

The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud issued notice to the Gujarat trial court to suspend the proceedings against the The Wire, a news portal till April 12th.

A defamation case was filed against the Wire, a news portal by Jay Shah, son of BJP president Amit Shah.  The Apex Court asked the Gujarat Court to not proceed in this criminal defamation case till it hears the matter relating to the quashing of case next on April 12.

While giving this order, the Apex Court also lashed out on media fraternity for “irresponsible reporting”. The Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra criticized media and said “we expect the media should be responsible, electronic media should be more responsible”. The court asserted that media cannot write whatever it feels about anyone. The court emphasized that freedom of speech and expression must be exercised by observing the limits.

However, Chief Justice Misra made it clear that his remarks were of a general nature and not connected to the particular case being heard.

Senior Advocate N K Kaul, appearing for Jay Shah, contended that The Wire story was a “manufactured story, scurrilous reporting” and was meant to damage Shah’s reputation. “The reporting was part of a design”, he said

Kapil Sibal who appeared for the news portal said it was only asking questions to Shah. “If journalism is going to be throttled like this, no journalist can ask questions,” he said.

The article was published by on October 8, 2017 titled ‘Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah’. According to The Wire article, Jay Shah’s firm had increased 16,000 times in the year after Narendra Modi was elected as Prime Minister. Jay Shah has separately filed a civil defamation suit of Rs 100 crore against the website over the article.  Jay Shah had rejected the charge made in the article, insisting the story was “false, derogatory and derogatory”.

The Gujarat High Court on January 8 had rejected a petition filed by the news portal, seeking quashing of a criminal defamation case filed against it by Jay Shah over an article related to his company’s sudden financial growth.

The suit has been filed against the author of the article Rohini Singh, founding editors of the news portal Siddharth Varadarajan, Siddharth Bhatia and M K Venu, managing editor Monobina Gupta, public editor Pamela Philipose and the Foundation for Independent Journalism. The foundation publishes The Wire.

After the suit was filed on October 9, 2017, the court initiated proceedings against them under section 202 of Code of Criminal procedure, under which an inquiry can be made to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding.

You Might Also Like

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Honeymoon Murder

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Shein Accused of Dark Patterns in EU

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Apoorva Sinha March 15, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, in its detailed judgment, upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse TikTok’s…

News
June 15, 2025

The Honeymoon Murder

A recent honeymoon murder case has shocked the entire nation. Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi was found dead in a gorge…

News
June 15, 2025

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Harvard University has recently achieved a significant victory in its legal fight against the Trump administration’s attempt to ban the…

News
June 9, 2025

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, who was arrested by West Bengal police on May 30,…

News
June 9, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?