NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: A government servant has the right to visit any person of his choice: says MP HC
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » A government servant has the right to visit any person of his choice: says MP HC
News

A government servant has the right to visit any person of his choice: says MP HC

By Maitreya Saha 3 Min Read
Share

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh, in a PIL filed by a group of advocates, has held the government servants ‘did not violate’ Rule 5 of Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, in so far as meeting the RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, was concerned, in Jabalpur during the local body elections in year 2015. The Hon’ble court was moved by the advocates of Democratic Lawyers Forum who pleaded that Rule 5 of Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, stated that a government servant should not canvas or otherwise interfere or use his influence in connection with or take part in any election to a legislative body. However, the respondent government officers, in their reply, denied meeting the RSS chief.

The court, in the present case, had to decide on the issues; whether a citizen, including a government officer, has a right to meet any person and the right of privacy to meet a person of his choice. A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Rajeev Kumar Dubey adjudicated the matter saying: “The meeting is said to have taken place in the office of RSS at Keshav Kutir. Meeting a Head of a Group does not show that such Government servant was canvassing or otherwise interfering or using his influence in connection with any election.”.

“There is no allegation that the Government servant has influenced any of his subordinates to vote in a particular manner. Therefore, it cannot be said that any Government servant has used his influence in connection with the election,” the court added, dismissing the PIL while further observing that; “we find the present public interest litigation filed by an Advocate, is a politically motivated petition in as much as the counsel for the petitioner was an agent of the Congress candidate”.

The court further said that the dispute in the present case is in respect of election of Mayor which is obviously a political issue and that the political issues are supposed to be settled through ballot not through a writ petition in the court, in obiter dicta.

 

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Maitreya Saha October 25, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?