NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Dentons Lee wins patent infringement lawsuit regarding dam construction at Djenne Mali, Africa
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Dentons Lee wins patent infringement lawsuit regarding dam construction at Djenne Mali, Africa
Deals

Dentons Lee wins patent infringement lawsuit regarding dam construction at Djenne Mali, Africa

By Legal Desire 2 Min Read
Share

Senior Attorney Seung-Hun Lee and Attorney Sung-Ha Park of Dentons Lee, representing the Defendants, recently won a patent infringement case related to the construction of a dam in Djenne Mali, Africa. The infringement suit was filed in Seoul Central District Court.

The dam construction at Djenne Mali was a business project led by the Export-Import Bank of Korea as the hosting financial institution, with the Mali government receiving support via the Economic Development Cooperation Fund of the Korean government. The builder on the project was a joint venture between Samsung C&T and Haejeon Industrial Co., Ltd.

The Plaintiff, a dam engineering company built based on Korean law, claiming that the technology used in the dam gate of the construction project was identical to that of the Plaintiff’s patented technology, filed a patent infringement lawsuit.

Dentons Lee represented the Defendants and argued that the Plaintiffs did not establish that an actionable patent infringement had occurred in Korea. The Plaintiff registered its patent in Korea. The Defendants only manufactured portions of the dam gate in Korea, but exported the parts to Mali, and the dam construction occurred in Mali. Therefore, the claimed patent infringement (which the Defendants denied) could not be proved in Korea where the patent was registered because all of the elements needed to establish a patent infringement did not occur in Korea.

The Court agreed, deciding that as only the component parts were manufactured in Korea and then exported to Mali and incorporated into an allegedly infringing dam gate in Mali, all elements of infringement did not occur in Korea and this would not constitute a patent infringement in Korea.

This Decision is significant because the Court has now provided guidance on territorial principles regarding patents and has ruled that to prove patent infringement in Korea, all elements of infringement must occur in Korea. This ruling will provide important guidance on claims in Korea stemming from alleged overseas patent infringement.

You Might Also Like

Baker McKenzie Acts on the Privatization of Vesync

Mayer Brown advises Munich Re Life US on strategic partnership with MIB to expand access to electronic medical data and develop advanced data analytics

Herbert Smith Freehills advises ad hoc noteholder group on the financial restructuring of InfraBuild’s 14.5000% Senior Secured Notes

Herbert Smith Freehills advises Rover on acquisition of Gudog

Latham & Watkins Advises on Agree Realty’s US$340.65 Million Forward Common Stock Offering

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire July 19, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Baker McKenzie Acts on the Privatization of Vesync

Baker McKenzie advised DBS Asia Capital Limited as the financial adviser to the offeror, Victory III Co., Ltd, in connection…

Deals
May 10, 2025

Mayer Brown advises Munich Re Life US on strategic partnership with MIB to expand access to electronic medical data and develop advanced data analytics

Mayer Brown is advising Munich Re Life US, part of Munich Re Group and a leader in risk assessment and…

Deals
May 6, 2025

Herbert Smith Freehills advises ad hoc noteholder group on the financial restructuring of InfraBuild’s 14.5000% Senior Secured Notes

Herbert Smith Freehills has acted as Australian counsel to the ad hoc group of noteholders on the restructuring of InfraBuild…

Deals
May 6, 2025

Herbert Smith Freehills advises Rover on acquisition of Gudog

The London Financial Sponsors practice of leading global law firm Herbert Smith Freehills has advised Rover Group, Inc. (Rover) on…

Deals
May 6, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?