Hon’ble Delhi High Court while dealing with a petition here on 28-02-2019 in the case of “AARUSHI GOYAL v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION” stated that the plea of alleged deficiencies regarding the manner of revaluation having come to the petitioner’s knowledge after seeing her revaluated answer-sheets, cannot at all be a reason to review.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Petitioner (AARUSHI GOYAL), a commerce student had appeared for her Class XII AISSCE examination conducted by the respondent/CBSE in March 2017. Aggrieved by the nature of the evaluation conducted by the respondent, on 13.09.2017, the petitioner had filed a civil writ petition bearing No.8552/2017 before this Court seeking directions to the respondent to re-evaluate her answer books in Economics and English (Core) in a proper manner and to provide her with a copy of the said answer books after re-evaluation.

This Court, on 09.02.2018, passed an order directing the respondent to provide the petitioner with a photocopy of her re-evaluated answer-sheets but denied the re- evaluation again. Appeal filed in this regard was also denied.

Thus, this application was filed seeking review of the order dated 09.02.2018 passed by this Court, challenging the overall accuracy and veracity of the re evaluation conducted by the respondent

DECISION OF THE COURT

Hon’ble Court held that the plea of alleged deficiencies regarding the manner of revaluation having come to the petitioner’s knowledge after seeing her revaluated answer-sheets, cannot at all be a reason to review.

Thus, the review petition was found meritless and was dismissed.

Read the full Judgement Here-

http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/REP/judgement/28-02-2019/REP28022019CW85522017.pdf