NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Delhi HC: Petitioner cannot be penalised for non-production of the petitioner by the concerned Jail Superintendent despite issuance of production warrants
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Delhi HC: Petitioner cannot be penalised for non-production of the petitioner by the concerned Jail Superintendent despite issuance of production warrants
Judgments

Delhi HC: Petitioner cannot be penalised for non-production of the petitioner by the concerned Jail Superintendent despite issuance of production warrants

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share
Delhi High Court (legaldesire.com)

Hon’ble Delhi High Court while dealing with a petition here on 26-03-2019 in the case of “ANIL KUMAR SINGH @SUNNY v. STATE THROUGH SHO P.S. NABI KARIM, DELHI” stated that petitioner cannot be penalised for non-production of the petitioner by the concerned Jail Superintendent despite issuance of production warrants.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

The petitioner was enlarged on bail on 30.03.2007 and continued on bail till his bail was cancelled by order dated 12.12.2018. The bail of the petitioner was cancelled solely on the ground that the matter pertained to the year 2007 and was adjourned on certain occasions as the petitioner was not produced by the Jail Authorities in Lucknow where the petitioner was incarcerated in another case.

Thus, this petition was filed seeks regular bail in FIR No.31/2007 under Sections 386/380/392/419/34 IPC, Police Station Nabi Karim.

DECISION OF THE COURT

Hon’ble Court held that petitioner cannot be penalised for non-production of the petitioner by the concerned Jail Superintendent despite issuance of production warrants.

Court further stated that the mere fact that the case is one of the oldest cases pending in the Court falling in the category of more than 10 years, can be no ground to cancel the bail and to incarcerate the petitioner specially when there is no fault of the petitioner.

Thus, the petition was allowed.

Read the full Judgement Here-

[embeddoc url=”http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/SAS/judgement/27-03-2019/SAS26032019BA6832019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash April 1, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?