NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Delhi HC: No Claim can be permitted if it is doubtful in any way
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Delhi HC: No Claim can be permitted if it is doubtful in any way
Judgments

Delhi HC: No Claim can be permitted if it is doubtful in any way

By Tanay Akash 3 Min Read
Share
Delhi High Court (legaldesire.com)

Hon’ble Delhi High Court has dismissed a Writ petition for claim here on 11-01-2019 stating that no claim can be permitted if such claim is doubtful in any sense including the ground of laches.

The above decision was given in the case of Arti Kapahi v. Union of India in which hon’ble court while dealing with the matters related to claims declared that if the claim made is doubtful then such claim cannot be granted at any cost.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

A notification under Sec 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 25th November 1980 followed by a declaration under Section 6 of the land Acquisition Act issued on 27 May 1985. The award was passed on 26th May 1987.

According to the Petitioner, the possession of the land in question has remained with the predecessor of the Petitioner and after his demise with the Petitioner which has continued from 1980 till date. The compensation was also returned by the petitioner immediately with interest.

This writ petition was filed by the applicant against the acquisition with respect to 6 Bighas 12 Biswas of land and not to disturb or hinder the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land.

DECISION OF THE COURT

Hon’ble Court held that apart from not having a case on merits, no explanation has been put forth by the Petitioner for the inordinate delay in approaching the Court. The passing of the 2013 Act cannot by itself constitute a cause of action when the Petitioner has taken no steps to pursue a challenge to the land acquisition proceedings in the meanwhile.

Court further held that such claims cannot be a subject matter of inquiry after the lapse of a reasonable period of time and beneficial provisions of Section 24 of the 2013 Act are not available to such incumbents. Court further sited several apex court judgement and held that such doubtful claims are barred due to delay and laches hence the writ petition got dismissed.

Read the full Judgement Here-

http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/SMD/judgement/14-01-2019/SMD11012019CW101402015.pdf

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash January 15, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?