NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Delhi HC directs parties to pay INR 1Lac in damages to Loreal for infringing the trademarks ‘GARNIER’ & L’OREAL’
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Delhi HC directs parties to pay INR 1Lac in damages to Loreal for infringing the trademarks ‘GARNIER’ & L’OREAL’
Judgments

Delhi HC directs parties to pay INR 1Lac in damages to Loreal for infringing the trademarks ‘GARNIER’ & L’OREAL’

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share
Delhi High Court (legaldesire.com)

Hon’ble Delhi High Court while dealing with a petition in the case of “Loreal v. Rehman Brothers & Ors.” stated that the Court, on the basis of reports of the commission issued, is entitled to award lump-sum damages and in any case the Court is empowered to award the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Two suits were filed by the plaintiffs naming CS(COMM) No.333/2018 and CS(COMM) No.334/2018 for permanent injunction restraining the two defendants therein namely Rehman Brothers and Kamieo International from infringing the mark ‘GARNIER’ and  ‘L’OREAL’ respectively  of the plaintiff by embossing the same on the counterfeit goods and passing them off as that of the plaintiff and for ancillary reliefs.

The first suit was brought up before this Court on 18th December, 2007 and the second one on 18th December, 2007. After injunction there were contradictions in the payment of lump-sum amount.

DECISION OF THE COURT

Hon’ble Delhi HC held that the Court, on the basis of reports of the commission issued, is entitled to award lump-sum damages and in any case the Court is empowered to award the costs of the suit to the plaintiff. Court awarded permanent injunction in each of the suits and also awarded costs/damages in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in each of the suits.

It was further held by the court that if the defendant No.1 pays Rs.50,000/- in each of the suits on or before 22nd February, 2019, the same shall be accepted in full and final settlement of the decree for damages/costs in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in each of the suits and if the said amount is not paid, the damages/costs of Rs.1,00,000/- in each suit will also incur interest at 10% per annum till the date of recovery.  

Full Judgment here:

[embeddoc url=”https://legaldesire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/LOreal-Vs-Rehman-Brothers.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash February 8, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?