NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Bombay High Court: Wife can’t rely on husband’s caste to contest election from reserved quota
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Bombay High Court: Wife can’t rely on husband’s caste to contest election from reserved quota
News

Bombay High Court: Wife can’t rely on husband’s caste to contest election from reserved quota

By Ankita Srivastava 3 Min Read
Share

The Bombay High Court held that wife cannot rely on her husband’s caste to contest an election from a reserved seat. The court relied on the decision of Supreme court in Valsamma Paul vs Cochin University and Ors. while passing this order.

A division bench of Justices Vasanti Naik and Riyaz Chagla passed the order after hearing a writ petition filed by one Anuradha Sudhakar Katkar who got elected as a corporator in the Sholapur Municipal Corporation on a seat reserved for Other Backward Classes (OBC).

The petitioner at the time of filing of the election form submitted documents claiming her ‘Tambat’ as her caste which is category under OBC, but it was her husband’s cast and not her father’s.

In February 2017, the petitioner was elected as corporator from the reserved OBC seat. Afterwhich, the Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee asked the petitioner to submit relevant caste documents of her father, which she did. The petitioner father’s caste was ‘Lohar NT’ which did not fall under the category of OBC.

On March 10, the State Election Commission issued a letter to the Secretary of Town Planning Management, Mantralaya, stating that the petitioner is disqualified and her seat should be canceled.

Advocate AB Tajane, on behalf of the petitioner, contended that even though his client contested the election on the basis of her husband’s caste, she submitted the relevant documents to the committee. Hence, the petitioner should not be disqualified by virtue of Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.

Advocate General A.P. Vanarse on behalf Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee & Ors. submitted that law laid down by the Supreme Court, itself disqualifies petitioner from contesting the election under her husband’s caste.

The Supreme Court in Valsamma Paul vs Cochin University said: “It is thus clear that wife can’t by relying on her husband’s caste claim right to contest election for the seat reserved for a Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe or Other Backward Classes candidate.”

Thus, the court held petitioner can’t rely on her husband’s caste to contest election and dismissed the petition.

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Ankita Srivastava October 24, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?