NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Bofors Case Update: Plea made in SC for an early hearing
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Bofors Case Update: Plea made in SC for an early hearing
News

Bofors Case Update: Plea made in SC for an early hearing

By Vidhi Koolwal 3 Min Read
Share

The Petitioners in the Bofors case have moved an application in the Hon’ble Supreme Court, asking for an early hearing date, owing to the revelation of a fresh financial report stating a financial quid pro quo for the ₹ 1,437 crore Howitzer gun deal in 1986.

The petition had been initially made by Mr. Ajay Agrawal, who alleged apparent collusiveness by CBI with the accused persons in the Bofors scam, saying the agency did not challenge the Delhi High Court’s May 31, 2005 judgement quashing all charges against the Europe-based Hinduja brothers.

The Petitioners have challenged the previous judgment of the Hon’ble Court after the CBI failed to approach the top court with the appeal within the 90-day deadline after the High Court verdict.

According to them, The CBI on January 22, 1990 had registered the FIR for the alleged offence of criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery under the IPC and other sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act against the accused on the grounds that certain public servants and private persons in India and abroad had entered into a criminal conspiracy between 1982 and 1987 in pursuance of which the offences of bribery, corruption, cheating and forgery were committed to the extent of Rs. 64 crore in the contracts for the supply of Bofors guns.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had admitted the Petition on October 18, 2005 and had allowed both the member to go ahead with the hearings in the case.

Mr. Agarwal, in his petition had narrated the series of events that took place in the case and how the CBI failed in its duty to make an appeal a case to take the accused to justice.

In a statement, he said that the “High Court had quashed the charges against the accused persons on technical grounds and the order was totally perverse which is liable to be set aside.”

It has been alleged that the special CBI court in Delhi had wrongfully discharged the accused from the case stating that the country cannot afford to spend hard-earned money on his extradition which has already cost Rs 250 crore. Quattrocchi, who had fled from here on July 29-30, 1993, has since, never appeared before any court in India to face prosecution. He passed away on July 13, 2013.

You Might Also Like

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Aumirah announces Comprehensive Newsletter Series on Key Legal Topics

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Vidhi Koolwal August 6, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Depo-Provera is a widely used contraceptive injection that has recently come under legal scrutiny. Thousands of women across the United…

News
November 9, 2024

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

The legal industry welcomes a new force in business development consulting with the launch of LawStrings Management, Founded by Shubham Malhotra,…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
September 30, 2024

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Latham & Watkins has advised Astorg Philanthropy Investments (API) in the €11 million Series A funding round of InHeart, a…

News
June 29, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?