NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Bangladesh High Court upheld death sentences to 139 people, for involvement in Mutiny of 2009
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Bangladesh High Court upheld death sentences to 139 people, for involvement in Mutiny of 2009
InternationalNews

Bangladesh High Court upheld death sentences to 139 people, for involvement in Mutiny of 2009

By Legal Desire 3 Min Read
Share

Bangladesh’s High Court on Monday upheld death sentences for 139 people, mostly former paramilitary men from the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), for their involvement in a mutiny in February 2009.

A total of 74 people, including 57 Army officials, were brutally murdered on February 25 and 26 in 2009 at the Pilkhana headquarters of the BDR, later renamed Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB).

The mutineers stole thousands of weapons from the headquarters of the BDR before embarking on the killing spree in the barracks. The home of the BDR chief was also stormed and his wife, guests and staff slaughtered before the building was razed. The remains of those butchered in the carnage were dumped in sewers or shallow graves.

The uprising quickly spread to other military bases, with thousands of soldiers seizing weapons and pledging allegiance to the mutineers in Dhaka before it was quashed by the army.

A three-member bench, led by Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain, pronounced the sentence on Monday.

“It was the most heinous, brutal and barbaric carnage of our history,” Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique told the Dhaka courtroom of the two-day massacre in which victims were shot, hacked to death and burned alive by marauding troops.

The sentences can be appealed again in the Supreme Court, which by law has the final say in all capital punishment cases. In 2013, a lower court had sentenced 152 soldiers to death for the grisly killings in a mass trial criticised by the United Nations rights chief as failing to meet basic standards of due process. One of those handed the death penalty died in custody, eight others had sentences commuted to life imprisonment and four were acquitted. The trial court had also jailed 160 others for life and given rigorous imprisonment to 256 people.

An official investigation into the mutiny blamed years of pent-up anger among ordinary soldiers, who felt their appeals for pay rises and better treatment were ignored.

On Monday, the High Court gave a seven-point recommendation list. It said the ‘Operation Dal Bhat’, started by the military-driven caretaker government in 2007, was a wrong decision. It also asked the government not to undertake such programmes in the future.

It also asked Border Guard Bangladesh to maintain professional relations between officers and soldiers as per the BGB Act. The court also asked the authorities concerned to investigate why intelligence agency of BDR (now BGB) had failed to get information on the mutiny beforehand. It also asked the government to pay dues of the BDR officials sacked following the carnage.

Source: The Hindu

You Might Also Like

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Honeymoon Murder

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Shein Accused of Dark Patterns in EU

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

TAGGED: BDR Judgment, BDR Mutiny, BDR Mutiny Judgment

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire November 28, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, in its detailed judgment, upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse TikTok’s…

News
June 15, 2025

The Honeymoon Murder

A recent honeymoon murder case has shocked the entire nation. Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi was found dead in a gorge…

News
June 15, 2025

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Harvard University has recently achieved a significant victory in its legal fight against the Trump administration’s attempt to ban the…

News
June 9, 2025

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, who was arrested by West Bengal police on May 30,…

News
June 9, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?