NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Allahabad HC: Disputed Questions of Fact cannot be adjudged under Sec. 482 Cr.P.C.
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Allahabad HC: Disputed Questions of Fact cannot be adjudged under Sec. 482 Cr.P.C.
Judgments

Allahabad HC: Disputed Questions of Fact cannot be adjudged under Sec. 482 Cr.P.C.

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share

Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has disposed an appeal here on 16-01-2019 stating that if the appeal is made on the basis of the disputed questions of facts, it cannot be adjudged under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The above decision was given in the case of Ashok and Others v. State of U.P And Another in which hon’ble court declared that in such matters the remedy will be available under other sections such as right to discharge under sec 239 or 227/228 of Cr.P.C. but not under Section 482.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

The applicant (Ashok) filed the present appeal under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the quashing of the complain case No- 6446 of 2008 (Mohan v. Ashok & Ors.), in which he was summoned under Sections 323/504 & 506 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)X of SC/ST Act.

The Applicant counsel relied on the fact that the incident was of 27.07.2008 and for the first time, complaint has been filed on 08.8.2008 with no injury report. Hence, the case is falsely done with malafide intention.

DECISION OF THE COURT

Hon’ble High Court held that all the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen.

Court further held that the disputed defense of the accused cannot be considered at this stage, leading to the disposal of the petition.

Read the full Judgement Here:

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadJudgmentDocument.do?judgmentID=6920193

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash January 18, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?