NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Herbert Smith Freehills succeeds for client in procurement dispute
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Herbert Smith Freehills succeeds for client in procurement dispute
Deals

Herbert Smith Freehills succeeds for client in procurement dispute

By Legal Desire 3 Min Read
Share

Herbert Smith Freehills has successfully represented its client High Speed Two (HS2) Limited in a high profile procurement dispute brought by Siemens Mobility Limited concerning two contracts for the manufacture and maintenance of rolling stock with an estimated value of £2 billion.

The contracts were awarded to a joint venture between Bombardier Transportation and Hitachi Rail in November 2021, following a lengthy procurement run between April 2017 and October 2021. Siemens was ranked in second place and brought proceedings challenging the decision to award the contracts to the Bombardier/Hitachi joint venture. The claim comprised seventeen sets of proceedings and challenged the procurement processes in a number of ways. Issues considered included HS2’s evaluation of the tenders, its conflict of interest processes, verification processes undertaken pre-contract award, and post-contract award consideration of potential modifications of the train design.

Mrs Justice O’Farrell DBE comprehensively dismissed all seventeen claims and made a number of comments on the running of procurement competitions, and what is required to bring a successful procurement challenge. This included reinforcing the Court’s supervisory jurisdiction in procurement cases; that it is not the role of the Court to carry out its own assessment of what decision the public authority should have made and replace the public authority’s decision accordingly. Siemens’ allegations were on a number of occasions considered by the Court to be based on its subjective assessment of what should have happened, and each of these were rejected on the basis that subjective disagreement is not sufficient to establish a manifest error by the authority.

The Judge also held that Siemens was not entitled to invoke public law duties where a remedy was available to it under the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016. This case concerned a commercial competition without a public law element, and judicial review is a remedy of last resort.

The Herbert Smith Freehills team comprised Partner Nusrat Zar, Senior Associates James Robson, Chloe Woodward, Lara Nassif and Olivia Walton, and Associates Abigail West, Hussein Mithani, Steven Chua and Phoebe Fox.

You Might Also Like

Freshfields advises Charterhouse on the entry of new investors in Novétude

Mayer Brown advises Vitruvian Partners on acquisition of premium travel business Great Rail Journeys

Mayer Brown advises OQ Trading on 15-year LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement with LNG Alliance relating to the Amigo LNG Project

Linklaters Zhao Sheng advises UBS AG on the acquisition of full ownership of UBS Securities in China

Hogan Lovells advises Hayfin Capital on minority investment in Novétude Group

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire December 1, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Freshfields advises Charterhouse on the entry of new investors in Novétude

Freshfields advised Charterhouse Capital Partners (“Charterhouse”), one of the longest-established private equity firms operating in Europe, on the transaction involving…

Deals
May 19, 2025

Mayer Brown advises Vitruvian Partners on acquisition of premium travel business Great Rail Journeys

London – Mayer Brown has advised private equity firm Vitruvian Partners on its acquisition of rail specialist tour operator Great…

Deals
May 19, 2025

Mayer Brown advises OQ Trading on 15-year LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement with LNG Alliance relating to the Amigo LNG Project

Singapore – Mayer Brown advised OQ Trading (OQT) on its 15-year LNG sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with LNG Alliance…

Deals
May 19, 2025

Linklaters Zhao Sheng advises UBS AG on the acquisition of full ownership of UBS Securities in China

Linklaters and its China joint operation partner Zhao Sheng Law Firm (Zhao Sheng) acted as joint legal advisors to UBS…

Deals
May 19, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?