NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Government Dues Can Be Extinguished Under A Resolution Plan – Chennai NCLT
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Government Dues Can Be Extinguished Under A Resolution Plan – Chennai NCLT
Judgments

Government Dues Can Be Extinguished Under A Resolution Plan – Chennai NCLT

By Legal Desire 4 Min Read
Share

The question whether Government dues can be extinguished under a Resolution Plan has been of much debate, however, a Bench of the Chennai NCLT has put the question to rest for the time being. A Bench of the Chennai NCLT presided by Ch. Mohd Sharief Tariq, Member (Judicial) in the Judgement dated 11.03.19 in the Insolvency Petition of M/s. Star Agro Marine Exports Private Limited; while approving the Resolution Plan has specifically held that “the claims of the Operational Creditors like the income tax department, sales tax department or any other statutory authority’s dues can be waived off under the provisions of the I&B Code, 2016 and the regulations made thereunder while approving the `Resolution Plan”.

Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, (Partner Designate – L&L Partners)
Mr. Prateek Mishra (Managing Associate – L&L Partners)

The Bench heard arguments on behalf of the Resolution Applicant i.e Seelam Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. (SIDPL) who was represented by Shri Nakul Sachdeva [Partner Designate – L&L Partners {formerly Luthra & Luthra Law Offices}] Mr. Thriyambak J. Kanan & Mr. Prateek Mishra. The Resolution Professional was represented by Ms. M. Savitha Devi & Ms. R.V Yaiura Devi.

It was argued on behalf of the Resolution Applicant that the term ‘Operational Creditor’ is defined under Sub-Section [20] of Section 5 of the Code and means a person to whom an operational debt is owed. A conjoint reading of the definitions of ‘Operational Creditor’ and “Operational Debt” would reveal that the Central Government, State Government or Local Authority [as the case may be] would be an Operational Creditor qua a Company against whom the said Central Government, State Government or Local Authority [as the case may be] has a debt in respect of payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force. It was further argued that in view of a conjoint reading of Section 30[2] of the Code with Regulation 37 and 38 of the CIRP Regulations it is clear that there is no legal bar in extinguishing and/or reducing Operational Debts owed to Operational Creditors under a Resolution Plan subject to the condition that the “payment of the debts of operational creditors shall not be less than the amount to be paid to the operational creditors in the event of a liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 53”.

The Bench appreciating the arguments made on behalf of the Resolution Applicant held that if the claims of the Operational Creditors like Income Tax Department, Sales Tax Department or any of the other statutory authorities cannot be met out of the sale of the assets of the corporate debtor in the event of liquidation then no provision could be possible to be made in the `Resolution Plan’.  The Bench also clarified that in view of Section 30[2] and Regulation 37 a Resolution Plan shall provide for measures as may be necessary for Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor for maximization of value of its assets by curing or waiving off any breach of the terms of any debt due from the corporate debtor and to reduce the amount payable to the creditors.

Read Order here:

[embeddoc url=”https://legaldesire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Star-Agro-Marine-Exports-Pvt-Ltd-MA-520.cleaned.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire March 30, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?