NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Chhattisgarh HC: It’s government officers’ duty not to contravene any other previous orders.
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Chhattisgarh HC: It’s government officers’ duty not to contravene any other previous orders.
Judgments

Chhattisgarh HC: It’s government officers’ duty not to contravene any other previous orders.

By Palak Arora 2 Min Read
Share

A two-judge bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 30.01.2019 in Dile Ram Dahire V. State of Chhattisgarh (WRIT PETITION (S) NO.620 OF 2019) dismissed the appeal. The bench was headed by JUSTICE P. Sam Koshy.

FACTS:

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 where the petitioner had been transferred from Bilaspur to District Koriya. The petitioner vides order was posted as Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue) Masturi. The District Election Officer had assigned the election duties to the petitioner in the capacity of the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) as an Election Registration Officer. The duty assigned was to supervise the preparation / finalisation of the electoral rolls. The State Election Commission had himself instructed all the Collectors and officers not to shift the place of posting of any of the officers who had been assigned election duties without the leave of the Election Commission but still he was transferred.

ISSUES:

·       Whether the petitioner was in fact assigned election work?

·       Whether the impugned order should set aside?

OBSERVATIONS:

The court observed that:-

  • The impugned order seems to be in total contravention to the order of the Chief Election Officer State of Chhattisgarh.
  • It was the duty of the government officers duty to take full care while passing any order as to not contravene the previous orders.
  • Prima-facie a strong case for grant of stay had been made out.

HELD:

The court put a stay on the impugned judgement and order with the following directions:-

  • Petitioner should make the detailed representation within a period of 10 days from the date of this judgement.
  • The respondent No.1 take an appropriate decision within a further period of 60 days.

For full judgement refer: 

[embeddoc url=”http://cg.nic.in/hcbspjudgement/judgements_web/WP(S)620_19(30.01.19).pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Palak Arora February 1, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?