NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC to hear plea challenging clean chit by the SIT to Narendra Modi in Gujarat riots
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC to hear plea challenging clean chit by the SIT to Narendra Modi in Gujarat riots
News

SC to hear plea challenging clean chit by the SIT to Narendra Modi in Gujarat riots

By Laghavi 4 Min Read
Share

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would hear after four weeks a plea by Zakia Jafri challenging the clean chit by the SIT to then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in connection with the 2002 Godhra riots.

Zakia, the wife of Ehsan Jafri, an ex-MP who was killed in one of the worst incidents during the riots, has challenged the Gujarat High Court’s October 5, 2017, order rejecting her plea against the SIT’s decision. A very uneventful day it was in the Ahmedabad’s Gulberg Society.

The matter came up for hearing before a bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi.

“You are asking for four weeks and we are giving you four weeks. List the matter after four weeks,” the bench said.

Ms Jafri’s counsel on the other hand, said that the plea pertained to an alleged “larger conspiracy” during the period between February 27, 2002 and May 2002. Her counsel had said that when the case was before the trial judge, a protest filed by the petitioner was set aside without considering ‘substantiated merits’.

The SIT filed its closure report on February 8, 2012, citing “no prosecutable evidence” against PM Modi and 63 others, and handed all 64, including the PM, a clean chit. Ms Jafri’s plea in the Supreme Court says that the Gujarat High Court had “failed to appreciate” the petitioner’s complaint. Ms Jafri sought an interim order to the SIT for carrying out a further investigation.

 

A brief History

During the Gujarat riots, on February 2002, a Hindu mob attacked the Gulberg society in Ahmedabad in which 69 people were killed. Among the deceased was former MP Ehsan Jafri. The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition of Zakia Jafri, wife of the former Congress MP, Ehsan Jafri, in November 2007, seeking the court’s directive to the police to register a complaint against the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 62 others for their alleged involvement in the Gulberg Society massacre. A SIT was constituted by the Supreme Court in order to look into the matter inquisitively. In August 2009, SIT filed charge sheet in the Gulberg Society massacre case.The Supreme Court permitted Special Investigation Team to conduct a further probe on the complaint by Zakia Jafri that Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 62 others orchestrated the 2002 riots in Gujarat. The SIT in a “summary closure report” — says there was no “prosecutable evidence” against Mr. Modi, who was among 62 persons named in an omnibus complaint filed by Ms. Jafri and the Citizens for Justice and Peace. In the end, the special court convicts 24 persons and acquitted 36 persons. 11 get life imprisonment for Gulberg Society massacre; one gets 10 years in jail and 12 convicts get seven years in jail.

The firing by Ehsan Jafri, did not provoke the mob to kill him. It was a cruel day for all the people killed during the riot. He was a very staunch Congressman, as quoted by the many witnesses who claim that Mr. Jafri tried his best to get some help from the then chief minister Mr. Modi. But all his cries went in vain. Now, some sign of relief can be enjoyed by his wife whose plea against the SIT order will be heard after a period of 4 weeks.    

 

 

You Might Also Like

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Honeymoon Murder

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Shein Accused of Dark Patterns in EU

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Laghavi January 16, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, in its detailed judgment, upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse TikTok’s…

News
June 15, 2025

The Honeymoon Murder

A recent honeymoon murder case has shocked the entire nation. Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi was found dead in a gorge…

News
June 15, 2025

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Harvard University has recently achieved a significant victory in its legal fight against the Trump administration’s attempt to ban the…

News
June 9, 2025

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, who was arrested by West Bengal police on May 30,…

News
June 9, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?