NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC: Intention to cause Death is necessary for an offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC: Intention to cause Death is necessary for an offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code
JudgmentsSupreme Court

SC: Intention to cause Death is necessary for an offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code

By Tanay Akash 2 Min Read
Share

Hon’ble Supreme Court has disposed a Criminal appeal here on 04-01-2019 by stating that for being an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as IPC), there must be an intention to cause death.

The above decision was given in the case of Champa Lal Dhakar v. Naval Singh Rajput & Ors. in which honourable court discussed the basic ingredients for being an offence under sec 307 of IPC which is attempt to murder.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Champa Lal Dhakar (Appellant) lodged an FIR against Naval Singh (Respondent No-1) under Sections 147,148,451,325/149,307/149,294/149 and 506/149 of the IPC. The learned Additional Session Judge, Sironj, Vidisha framed charges under Sections 147,148,451,325/149,307/149,294/149 and 506/149 of the IPC.

Unsatisfied with the order passed regarding charges, the respondents filed criminal revision (Application No- 830 of 2007) on the basis of injuries sustained by the appellant. The High Court by the impugned and order passed partly allowed the revision and directed the trail court to reconsider its’ order with regard to framing of the charge.

The complainant became dissatisfied with the decision of the High Court and filed the appeal before this court.

DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the complainant sustained injuries on the nose and fracture of the nasal bone was found. This may fall within the grievous hurt, but it cannot be said that even, prima facie a case is made out for the offence under Section 307 of the IPC.

Court further held that there must be an intention to cause death for any offence committed under Section 307 of IPC. A charge under section 325/149 ought to be framed and the High court has done no mistake in its order.

Thus, Appeal fails and accordingly dismissed.

Read the full Judgment Here:

[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2008/12788/12788_2008_Judgement_04-Jan-2019.pdf” download=”all”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Tanay Akash January 5, 2019
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?