5 Judges Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday decriminalised homosexuality by partially striking down the colonial era provisions of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra and comprising Justices Rohinton F. Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra gave four separate but concurring judgment. CJI is the first judge to read out his verdict. Denial of self expression is like death, he says.
Section 377 is irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary, he says.
Delivering the judgment for himself and on behalf of Justice Khanwilkar, he overturns the Suresh Koushal judgment, thereby effectively decriminalising homosexuality. The LGBTQ community possesses equal rights as any other citzen, he notes.
“Societal morality cannot trump constitutional morality. Societal morality cannot overturn the fundamental rights of even a single person,” he states.
“Sexual orientation is biological, innate. She or he has no control over who they get attracted to. Any repression will be a violation of free expression,” he adds.”Our Constitution nurtures dissent as a safety valve of society and it does not impose conformity. We cannot change history but pave the way for better future.”
“Centre must give wide periodic publicity to SC judgment to eliminate stigma attached to LGBT community.”
The judgment further states: “The LGBTQ community needs the rainbow of hope for the sake of the humanity. They should be allowed to live with dignity and without pretense. This is their journey to dignity, equality and liberty. It is time to bid adieu to prejudicial perceptions deeply ingrained in social mindset. It is time to empower LGBTQ community against discrimination. They should be allowed to make their choices.”
Justice Chandrachud said “Tragedy and anguish inflicted by Section 377 should be remedied. Macaulay’s legacy exists 68 years after the coming of a liberal Constitution. Human instinct to love has been constrained. Sexual orientation has become a reason for blackmail on the internet.”
Quoting Leonard Cohen, he says, “Shadows of a receding past controls the quest of LGBTQ for fulfillment.”
As the verdict is being delivered, jubliant gay rights activists celebrate on the lawns of the court. Shouts of ‘Hip Hip Hurray’ echo on the premises.
An alliance of churches and a Christian group Trust of God Ministries had opposed the scrapping of the colonial era law.
Advocate Manoj George, for an alliance of churches, said “carnal desire,” with or without consent, was an offence under Section 377. It was against the order of nature.
Senior advocate K. Radhakrishnan, for Trust of God Ministries, argued that striking down Section 377 IPC could increase the instances of sexually-transmitted diseases such as AIDS.
Apostolic Alliance of Churches and Utkal Christian Association and some other NGOs and individuals, including Suresh Kumar Kaushal, have also favoured retaining the controversial clauses.
Mr. Kaushal had also challenged the 2009 verdict of the High Court in the apex court, which had restored Section 377.
Read the full judgment here:
[embeddoc url=”https://legaldesire.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/14961_2016_Judgement_06-Sep-2018.pdf”]
The Petitioners: