NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC asks for Centre’s View on Exclusion of Creamy Layer From Reservation Benefits
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC asks for Centre’s View on Exclusion of Creamy Layer From Reservation Benefits
News

SC asks for Centre’s View on Exclusion of Creamy Layer From Reservation Benefits

By Sugam Shine 5 Min Read
Share

The Supreme Court today has asked for the view of the Centre in the form of an affidavit on a PIL that sought exclusion of the creamy layer, that includes relatively wealthier or well educated, among SC/ST tribes in matters of providing reservation in jobs and education centre.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar granted the Centre four weeks to file the affidavit and posted the PIL for further hearing in the second week of July.

CJI Misra told Additional Solicitor General P S Narasimha who appeared for the Centre “You take a stand on it and file an affidavit”.

The plea has been filed by Samta Andolan Samiti, the umbrella body of general and OBC government employees and 9 persons belonging to the SC/ST community.

Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Shobhit Tiwari representing the petitioners sought introduction of the creamy layer concept in SC/ST reservation to keep the rich among them out to ensure that the benefits go to the poor and the needy.

The counsel appearing for the petitioners said “We are on behalf of the suppressed amongst the SC/ST. But the Centre’s stand is that the whole SC/ST community is still backward and reservation has to be given to entire community with no identification of the creamy layer”, said Shankaranarayanan.

ASG Narasimha representing the government said “there cannot be creamy layer for SC/ST. Presidential determination of SC/ST groups cannot be touched.” The bench then asked the ASG “anyways you make your stand clear in an affidavit.”

The PIL lists Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, National Commission For Scheduled Castes National Commission for Scheduled Tribes as respondents.

Due to non-application of concept of creamy layer in SCs and STs, the actually backward and deprived members of the SCs and STs are having a heart burning that uplifted/affluent and advanced portion of castes included in SCs and STs are taking away the benefits, which are actually designed for them, the lawyers argued.

“The petitioners have preferred this writ petition (PIL) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners are the residents of the State of Rajasthan and belong to the poor and downtrodden strata of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes community. Thus the petitioners have approached this Hon’ble Court for protection of their fundamental rights as the creamy layer in the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Communities are siphoning off of the reservation benefits given to them by the State Government as well as the Central Government”, said the plea.

“The Petitioners submit that it is due to the fact that the uplifted / affluent and advanced sections of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities snatch away the maximum benefit and the 95% members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities are in disadvantageous position and they are still without any benefit of reservation and the benefit of Government Schemes meant for backward Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities. Thus, the benefits of reservation policy are not percolating down to the people, who are in actual need of the same and the practice of including the members of the creamy layers of the said Communities has resulted in abuse by the advanced and affluent members of the said communities”, it said.

The petitioners in their plea have prayed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, whereby all the Respondents will be directed to exclude creamy layer from SCs and STs, or to pass any appropriate Writ, order or direction, whereby all the Respondents be directed to issue appropriate instruction and guidelines prescribing parameters and criteria for excluding creamy-layer from SCs and STs, in parimateria to OBC.

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sugam Shine March 28, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?