NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Additional Compensation Imposed in Lieu of Imprisonment for Dishonor of Cheque
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Additional Compensation Imposed in Lieu of Imprisonment for Dishonor of Cheque
News

Additional Compensation Imposed in Lieu of Imprisonment for Dishonor of Cheque

By Apoorva Sinha 2 Min Read
Share

A three-judges bench comprising of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud entertained a Special Leave Petition [SLP], for setting aside the punishment for dishonor of Cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant was sentenced by  the Judicial First Class Magistrate- II, Ottappalam in 2010 to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,45,000/- to the complainant under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The convicted (appellant) moved to Court of Additional Session Judge, Palakkad Division at Ottapalam for setting aside the order of the sentence which was dismissed on 5th August, 2011. A Criminal Revision Petition was filed in the High Court of Kerala at Eranakulam by the appellant on 10th February, 2012. The High Court of Kerala confirmed the order of the sentence order by the lower court.

The appellant deposited the additional amount of Rs. 1,00,000 by the order of the Supreme Court in the month of January this year. The Hon’ble Supreme Court appreciated the fact that appellant complied to all the directions of the court and taking the overview of the matter, the order of the imprisonment was modified in lieu of the additional compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 already deposited by the appellant.

However, the SC is ready to re-consider the matter if the complainant is not satisfied with the judgment.

Read the full judgment: P. Ramadas v State of Kerala and Others, http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/supremecourt/2012/20500/20500_2012_Judgement_19-Feb-2018.pdf

You Might Also Like

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Honeymoon Murder

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Shein Accused of Dark Patterns in EU

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Apoorva Sinha February 24, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Bombay High Court Decision: TikTok’s Petition Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, in its detailed judgment, upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse TikTok’s…

News
June 15, 2025

The Honeymoon Murder

A recent honeymoon murder case has shocked the entire nation. Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi was found dead in a gorge…

News
June 15, 2025

Harvard University Wins Legal Battle Against Trump’s International Student Ban

Harvard University has recently achieved a significant victory in its legal fight against the Trump administration’s attempt to ban the…

News
June 9, 2025

Sharmistha Panoli’s Case: Question on Free Speech

Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer, who was arrested by West Bengal police on May 30,…

News
June 9, 2025

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?