NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Dinakaran-EC bribery case: Delhi HC dismisses middleman’s bail plea
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Dinakaran-EC bribery case: Delhi HC dismisses middleman’s bail plea
News

Dinakaran-EC bribery case: Delhi HC dismisses middleman’s bail plea

By Bhavya Dubey 4 Min Read
Share

The Delhi High Court on Thursday rejected the bail plea of a middleman, arrested in the Election Commission bribery case allegedly involving AIADMK leader TTV Dinakaran and others. Justice Mukta Gupta dismissed the bail application of middleman, Sukesh Chandrashekar, who was arrested on April 16 last year and was denied bail once by the high court and thrice by the trial court.

The Delhi Police had opposed his bail plea saying his conduct, even while in custody, had shown scant respect for the law and therefore, he should not be granted the relief. Additional Public Prosecutor Hirein Sharma had told the court that three more cases were registered against Chandrashekar while he was in custody and there were a total of 24 FIRs lodged against him.

Referring to the new FIRs lodged against him while he was in custody, the prosecutor had said while Chandrashekar was supposed to be taken by train, he was going by air along with nine policemen, all of whom were dismissed from service. The lawyer had also claimed that the accused had made a call to the trial court judge hearing the case, impersonating a person from a Supreme Court judge’s office and asked her to release him on bail.

The call was traced to a constable’s phone while Chandrashekar was in custody, the prosecutor alleged. Senior advocate Sudhir Nandrajog and advocate Anand Pandey, appearing for Chandrashekar, had contended that the alleged main beneficiary, Dinakaran, was already out on bail and the same relief was granted to the policemen.

They said the other accused in the case, including Dinakaran’s close aide Mallikarjuna, as well as suspected hawala operators Nathu Singh and Lalit Kumar were on bail. The high court had on June 15 last year rejected his bail plea on the ground that the police had seized a fake Rajya Sabha member ID card from his possession.

A charge sheet was filed by the police before the trial court in the case on July 14 last year, alleging that Dinakaran and Chandrashekar had conspired to bribe Election Commission (EC) officials to get the ‘two leaves’ symbol for their party. The police has also included in the charge sheet allegations of forgery for purpose of cheating, using forged document as genuine, possessing a forged document, intending to use it as genuine and criminal conspiracy.

Chandrashekar has also moved a separate plea in the high court alleging he was tortured despite an order not to subject him to violence inside the Tihar Jail where he is in custody. The claim was denied by the jail authorities, who said it was an “afterthought of the shrewd mind of the accused”.

Chandrashekar was arrested for allegedly taking money from Dinakaran to bribe EC officials to get the AIADMK ‘two leaves’ symbol for the Sasikala  faction in a by-election to the R K Nagar Assembly seat in Tamil Nadu. Dinakaran, also charge-sheeted by the police, was arrested here on April 25 after four days of questioning for allegedly attempting to bribe EC officials for the symbol. The bypoll was necessitated by the death of Tamil Nadu CM Jayalalithaa, who represented the assembly segment.

The EC had frozen the AIADMK’s symbol after the two factions–one led by Dinakaran’s aunt Sasikala and the other by former chief minister O Panneerselvam staked a claim to it. Mallikarjuna was arrested for allegedly facilitating a Rs 50 crore deal between Dinakaran and Chandrashekar.

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Bhavya Dubey January 11, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?