NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Two years and no reply, CIC awards Rs 5000 compensation to RTI applicant
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Two years and no reply, CIC awards Rs 5000 compensation to RTI applicant
News

Two years and no reply, CIC awards Rs 5000 compensation to RTI applicant

By Ankita Srivastava 3 Min Read
Share

The Central Information Commission awards Rs 5000 compensation to RTI applicant, who was made to wait for 2 long years for the information.

The CIC’s Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha hearing the complaint filed by RTI applicant Aabid Hussain awarded a compensation of Rs 5,000 to be paid by Cantonment Board, Jabalpur, which kept him waiting for 2 long years when he sought copies of some General Land Record survey numbers 127, 127/1 and 127/2.

RTI applicant required the information to place it before a civil court in his land case which was pending before a court. The RTI application was filed on August 31, 2015. Thereafter, the first appeal was scheduled for October 5, 2015, followed by the second appeal on November 24, 2015.

Whereas, the information was provided to him in October 2017, when he approached the CIC and a notice of hearing was issued to CPIO, Cantonment Board, but it was too late by then.

RTI applicant in his complaint requested the Central Information Commission to award of compensation in view of the “gross detriment” suffered by him for the unreasonable delay of two years.

The applicant in his complaint also said he feels harassed waiting for the information all this while.

CPIO in her defence submitted that her predecessor CPIO & Office Superintendent, A.K Pathak was responsible for replying to the RTI application, who retired in January, 2016. She further submitted that she has assumed office only in February, 2016 and has provided information to the applicant on 13.10.2017.

CIC officer Divya Prakash said, “It is mandatory upon the present CPIO to deal with all such pending RTI Applications and not wait for the CIC to issue a notice of hearing to provide a reply to RTI Applicants.”

The CIC in its order stated “Commission directs the public authority through its Chief Executive Officer to compensate the Appellant by an amount of Rs.5000/- for the inconvenience and detriment caused to him. The CPIO should ensure that this amount is remitted to the Appellant by demand draft/pay order within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.”

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Ankita Srivastava October 23, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?