NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

13 years 🥳 of Publication, 100k+ Stories, 30+ Countries

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Ryan murder case: Bombay HC says no to transit anticipatory bail for school trustees
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Ryan murder case: Bombay HC says no to transit anticipatory bail for school trustees
News

Ryan murder case: Bombay HC says no to transit anticipatory bail for school trustees

By Bhavya Dubey 3 Min Read
Share

The Bombay High Court Thursday rejected the transit anticipatory bail applications filed by trustees of Ryan International Group of Institutions in connection with the murder of a Class II student in Gurgaon’s Ryan International School last week. The court, however, continued their interim protection from arrest till 5 pm Friday.

This interim protection was granted on the condition that the group’s CEO, Ryan Pinto, and his parents, founding chairman Augustine Pinto and managing director Grace Pinto, deposit their passports with the Mumbai Commissioner Police or any other officer authorised by the city police chief by 9 pm Thursday. The protection was sought by their counsel Niteen Pradhan to allow them to approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court to seek pre-arrest bail in the matter. Rejecting their applications, Justice Ajay Gadkari said, “If you fail to deposit the passports, then the interim protection will also stand rejected.”

He added: “The anticipatory bail applications stand rejected. At this stage, the counsel seeks that the interim protection granted to them since Tuesday be extended. The same is extended till 5 pm on Friday.”

Seven-year-old Pradyuman Thakur was found with his throat slit in a washroom on the school premises on September 8. Barun Thakur, the child’s father, had also approached the Bombay High Court to file an intervention application opposing the Pintos’ anticipatory bail pleas. On Thursday, his counsel Sushil Tekriwal argued that the Pintos were seeking “wider relief in the garb of a transit bail application”. “Moreover, their prayer should be rejected keeping in view the nature of offence,” he said, adding that their present approach was “escapist”.

 “The place of offence is Haryana. Therefore, the place of jurisdiction should also be Haryana,” he argued, adding that the Pintos could be tampering with evidence by giving instructions to their subordinates from Mumbai.
The state of Maharashtra also opposed the bail, citing several court orders, and said the jurisdiction for seeking anticipatory bail lay in Haryana.

The Pintos’ lawyer argued, “We are seeking to protect our interests. Allow us to go before the appropriate court and we will participate in the investigation.”

You Might Also Like

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Bhavya Dubey September 15, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Finalize Merger, Creating $2B Global Law Firm

June 2, 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel have completed their transatlantic merger, forming Herbert…

News
June 5, 2025

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Data Use

Reddit has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, an AI startup, alleging unauthorised scraping of its user-generated content to train Anthropic's…

News
June 5, 2025

BCI Rules for Foreign Law Firms in India, Register your Law Firm in India

In May 2025, the Bar Council of India (BCI) officially notified new rules (via the Gazette dated 14 May 2025)…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
May 24, 2025

Amber Heard Loses Appeal in Insurance Battle Linked to Johnny Depp Defamation Case

Amber Heard's legal woes continue as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected her appeal against New…

NewsRead to Know
November 30, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?